Categories: Technology

Job-stealing Robots: A Growing Concern

DAVOS, Switzerland: Open markets and global trade have been blamed for job losses over the last decade, but global CEOs say the real culprits are increasingly job-stealing robots.

And while business leaders gathered at the annual World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos relish the productivity gains technology can bring, they warned this week that the collateral damage to jobs needs to be addressed more seriously.

From taxi drivers to health care professionals, technologies such as robotics, driverless cars, artificial intelligence, and 3-D printing mean more and more types of jobs are at risk. Adidas, for example, aims to use 3-D printing in the manufacture of some running shoes.

“Jobs will be lost, jobs will evolve and this revolution is going to be ageless, it is going to be classless and it is going to affect everyone,” said Meg Whitman, chief executive of Hewlett Packard Enterprise.

So while some supporters of Donald Trump and Brexit may hope new government policies will bring lost jobs back to America’s Rust Belt or Britain’s industrial north, economists estimate 86 percent of US manufacturing job losses are actually down to productivity, according to the WEF’s annual risks report.

“Technology is the big issue and we do not acknowledge that,” Mark Weinberger, chairman of consultancy EY, said on Thursday, arguing there was a tendency to always blame trading partners.

The political backdrop is prompting CEOs to take more seriously the challenge of long-life training of workforces to keep up with the exponential growth of technological advances.

“I think what we are reaching now is a time when we may have to find alternative careers through our lifetime,” Microsoft Chief Executive Satya Nadella told Reuters.

Over the last decade, more jobs have been lost to technology than any other factor, and John Drzik, head of global risk at insurance broker Marsh, expects more of the same.

“That is going to raise challenges, particularly given the political context,” Drzik, who helped compile the WEF report, said. Compared to clamping down on immigration by tightening borders, dealing with the impact of technology destroying jobs is something that is perhaps even less easily controlled.

While many advanced technologies remain more expensive than low- or medium-skilled labor in the near term, the shift is likely to accelerate as costs come down.

Technological advancements require governments, businesses, and academic institutions to develop more educated and highly skilled workforces, executives in Davos said.

But this shift to skilled workers also widens the income gap and fuels growing inequality.

Jonas Prising, CEO of staffing firm ManpowerGroup, noted that US unemployment is only about 2 to 2.5 percent among college-educated people but 9 or 10 percent among those with low or no skills. “The idea that we would ban automation as part of an evolution within the manufacturing industry is not really part of the discussion,” Prising said. He pointed to policies in countries like Denmark and Italy, where there is a focus on the employability of workers.

The scope of the employment risk from what the WEF calls the “fourth industrial revolution,” which “blurs the lines between the physical, digital, and biological spheres” is unclear.

A University of Oxford study in 2013 said nearly half of US jobs were at risk, while in 2015 Forrester Research predicted a net loss of only 7 percent by 2025, as some lost jobs will be replaced with new ones. Forrester predicts that by 2019, one-quarter of all job tasks will be offloaded to software robots, physical robots, or customer self-service automation.

Sameer
Sameer is a writer, entrepreneur and investor. He is passionate about inspiring entrepreneurs and women in business, telling great startup stories, providing readers with actionable insights on startup fundraising, startup marketing and startup non-obviousnesses and generally ranting on things that he thinks should be ranting about all while hoping to impress upon them to bet on themselves (as entrepreneurs) and bet on others (as investors or potential board members or executives or managers) who are really betting on themselves but need the motivation of someone else’s endorsement to get there.

Recent Posts

Exploring the Best Slot Games on 96ACE Singapore: What to Play in 2025

Singaporean players are always looking for fresh, high-payout, and visually captivating slot games that keep gameplay exciting. That’s exactly what…

1 day ago

Simon Guobadia Net Worth: A Prominent Businessman Who Became A Successful Millionaire

Simon Guobadia is a well-known figure in the entertainment industry who became a successful entrepreneur later. Born in Nigeria, he…

2 days ago

How Can You Start Investing in Gold Without Visiting a Dealer? Simple Online Methods to Begin Safely

Investing in gold is now easier than ever, and you don't need to visit a dealer in person to get…

3 days ago

Deion Sanders Net Worth: How Did The Former Player Build His Wealth Empire?

Deion Sanders is a former American player who excelled in football, baseball, and track sports. He was a professional cornerback…

3 days ago

How Much Does Facebook Pay For Views

Does Facebook pay for views? The answer is Yes, but it depends on the number of views. Content creators, advertisers,…

3 days ago

First Time Playing Online Slots? Here’s What You Need To Know

Thinking about playing online slots for the first time? You’re not alone. It’s one of the most popular ways to…

3 days ago