Categories: Technology

Job-stealing Robots: A Growing Concern

DAVOS, Switzerland: Open markets and global trade have been blamed for job losses over the last decade, but global CEOs say the real culprits are increasingly job-stealing robots.

And while business leaders gathered at the annual World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos relish the productivity gains technology can bring, they warned this week that the collateral damage to jobs needs to be addressed more seriously.

From taxi drivers to health care professionals, technologies such as robotics, driverless cars, artificial intelligence, and 3-D printing mean more and more types of jobs are at risk. Adidas, for example, aims to use 3-D printing in the manufacture of some running shoes.

“Jobs will be lost, jobs will evolve and this revolution is going to be ageless, it is going to be classless and it is going to affect everyone,” said Meg Whitman, chief executive of Hewlett Packard Enterprise.

So while some supporters of Donald Trump and Brexit may hope new government policies will bring lost jobs back to America’s Rust Belt or Britain’s industrial north, economists estimate 86 percent of US manufacturing job losses are actually down to productivity, according to the WEF’s annual risks report.

“Technology is the big issue and we do not acknowledge that,” Mark Weinberger, chairman of consultancy EY, said on Thursday, arguing there was a tendency to always blame trading partners.

The political backdrop is prompting CEOs to take more seriously the challenge of long-life training of workforces to keep up with the exponential growth of technological advances.

“I think what we are reaching now is a time when we may have to find alternative careers through our lifetime,” Microsoft Chief Executive Satya Nadella told Reuters.

Over the last decade, more jobs have been lost to technology than any other factor, and John Drzik, head of global risk at insurance broker Marsh, expects more of the same.

“That is going to raise challenges, particularly given the political context,” Drzik, who helped compile the WEF report, said. Compared to clamping down on immigration by tightening borders, dealing with the impact of technology destroying jobs is something that is perhaps even less easily controlled.

While many advanced technologies remain more expensive than low- or medium-skilled labor in the near term, the shift is likely to accelerate as costs come down.

Technological advancements require governments, businesses, and academic institutions to develop more educated and highly skilled workforces, executives in Davos said.

But this shift to skilled workers also widens the income gap and fuels growing inequality.

Jonas Prising, CEO of staffing firm ManpowerGroup, noted that US unemployment is only about 2 to 2.5 percent among college-educated people but 9 or 10 percent among those with low or no skills. “The idea that we would ban automation as part of an evolution within the manufacturing industry is not really part of the discussion,” Prising said. He pointed to policies in countries like Denmark and Italy, where there is a focus on the employability of workers.

The scope of the employment risk from what the WEF calls the “fourth industrial revolution,” which “blurs the lines between the physical, digital, and biological spheres” is unclear.

A University of Oxford study in 2013 said nearly half of US jobs were at risk, while in 2015 Forrester Research predicted a net loss of only 7 percent by 2025, as some lost jobs will be replaced with new ones. Forrester predicts that by 2019, one-quarter of all job tasks will be offloaded to software robots, physical robots, or customer self-service automation.

Sameer
Sameer is a writer, entrepreneur and investor. He is passionate about inspiring entrepreneurs and women in business, telling great startup stories, providing readers with actionable insights on startup fundraising, startup marketing and startup non-obviousnesses and generally ranting on things that he thinks should be ranting about all while hoping to impress upon them to bet on themselves (as entrepreneurs) and bet on others (as investors or potential board members or executives or managers) who are really betting on themselves but need the motivation of someone else’s endorsement to get there.

Recent Posts

The Real Problem With Letting Employees Use Personal Cards for Business

Small companies all started in the same place: employees used personal cards to cover work expenses and submitted receipts for…

5 hours ago

What You Should Know About Wastewater Certifications

Clean water is, undeniably, one of the most vital resources on earth, and the professionals who manage and treat wastewater…

1 day ago

How Leopoldo Alejandro Betancourt López Turned a €50 Million Bet on Hawkers Into a €100 Million Brand

Four friends in Spain started with $300 and a straightforward pitch: trendy sunglasses sold online at a fraction of what…

1 day ago

Tracing Salman Shahid’s Path from Pakistani Marketer to Global AI Visionary Leader

In a world where technology evolves at lightning speed, some leaders manage not only to keep pace but to shape…

1 day ago

7 Ways Long-Term Thinking Creates Business Tycoons

How do some people turn small ideas into massive business empires? You don't need a silver spoon or overnight luck.…

1 day ago

The Most Overlooked Expenses in Motorcycle Accident Claims

When someone is injured in a collision on two wheels, the crash itself is just the beginning of a long…

2 days ago